Skip to main content
Back to blog
AI Giants and Unions Are Suddenly on the Same Side. Here's What That Means for Your Job.
Current Events

AI Giants and Unions Are Suddenly on the Same Side. Here's What That Means for Your Job.

AI Giants and Unions Are Suddenly on the Same Side. Here's What That Means for Your Job.

See Editorial Note at Bottom

Intro

For most of this year, the data center story for workers has been about backlash: blocked permits, state moratoriums, local opposition groups, and — as covered here recently — a backlash finally reaching capital markets. Last week brought something different. The industry and organized labor stopped treating each other as separate interests and formed a joint coalition.

On September 28, Axios reported that OpenAI, Blackstone, QTS and SoftBank Group had joined five national building-trades unions to launch the American Infrastructure Alliance (AIA) — a multimillion-dollar effort aimed at negotiating data center standards with state and local governments instead of losing ground to outright construction bans. The unions involved are the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW), the International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers (SMART), the International Association of Heat and Frost Insulators and Allied Workers, the International Association of Iron Workers, and the United Association of Union Plumbers and Pipefitters (UA).

That's a real shift. For an industry that's spent the past year on defense, this is the first coordinated attempt to go on offense — and it's doing it with labor standing next to it, not just construction companies and lobbyists.

What the alliance actually wants

The AIA isn't trying to stop the backlash everywhere at once. It's starting with initial campaigns in seven states where data center fights have been especially contentious: Texas, Georgia, Ohio, Iowa, Pennsylvania, Indiana, and South Carolina, with the explicit goal of shaping state and local standards ahead of the 2027 legislative sessions — not the 2026 midterms happening right now.

The pitch, as Tag Greason, co-CEO of QTS, put it, is that responsible growth requires clear expectations for everyone involved. In practice, that means the alliance wants to negotiate guardrails — covering things like who pays for grid and water infrastructure, noise and lighting limits, and construction impact rules — in exchange for state and local governments agreeing not to pass blanket moratoriums. The coalition has already started running ads in Texas aimed directly at Governor Greg Abbott, arguing the state shouldn't have to choose between protecting its resources and continuing to build.

Unions are positioned as central to that pitch, not an afterthought. The alliance's own messaging frames the goal as activating union members to help convince officials that data centers can be built responsibly — essentially using organized labor's credibility with local communities to counter the narrative that this industry mainly benefits distant tech companies and out-of-state investors.

The industry's own numbers show why it's worried

The alliance didn't form in a vacuum, and its own research explains some of the urgency. Internal polling commissioned for its Ohio campaign found that 67% of Ohio voters surveyed held an unfavorable opinion of data centers, against just 18% favorable — a lopsided number for an industry that has spent years selling itself as an economic-development win. Notably, the same poll found those numbers largely reverse when respondents are told data centers will keep electricity costs in check, create jobs, and generate tax revenue — which is precisely the argument the alliance now has to make convincingly, in public, for the pledge to mean anything.

That tension — between what the industry promises and what communities actually believe they'll get — is the real fight behind the fight. On one side, the broader political backdrop includes roughly 20 states that have already enacted moratoriums or bans on data center construction, with seven more states advancing restrictive legislation, and progressive lawmakers including Sen. Bernie Sanders and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez have introduced a bill that would pause data center construction nationwide until federal AI safeguards are established. On the other side, even normally pro-growth governors have reversed course — Abbott halted new approvals in Texas in early August and said afterward, bluntly, that the industry had brought the backlash on itself, while Pennsylvania's Josh Shapiro signed an executive order tightening development rules just a year after celebrating a $20 billion Amazon investment in his state.

The job-creation argument has a real counter-argument

Before taking the alliance's "responsible growth" framing at face value, it's worth knowing what its critics are actually disputing — because the fight isn't just about moratoriums, it's about how many jobs this industry actually creates once construction ends.

Food & Water Watch, an environmental advocacy group, published research in January estimating that as few as 23,000 people nationwide held permanent data center jobs — roughly 0.01% of total U.S. employment — even as the industry consumes more than 4% of the country's electricity. The group's managing director of policy, Mitch Jones, has been a vocal critic of the alliance specifically, describing the construction jobs data centers generate as largely "transitory and fleeting."

That critique lands differently depending on who you are. If you're pursuing a long construction career moving from megaproject to megaproject, "transitory" construction work is still real, well-paid work, repeated across dozens of builds — which is exactly why the building trades unions are in this coalition rather than opposing it. If you're a community weighing whether a single project will deliver lasting local employment once the cranes leave, the skepticism about permanent headcount is a fair question the industry hasn't fully answered. Both things can be true at once, and they explain why unions representing construction trades and advocacy groups representing host communities have ended up on opposite sides of this particular fight.

What this means if you work in this industry

For anyone currently in or entering the skilled trades side of data center work, having IBEW, SMART, the Iron Workers, and the other building trades unions formally embedded in an industry-funded coalition — rather than negotiating from outside it — is worth paying attention to, for a few reasons.

First, it's a seat at the table on standards that will directly affect job sites: safety rules, training requirements, and the construction standards the alliance is explicitly trying to negotiate in exchange for avoiding moratoriums. Second, it signals the building trades believe continued data center construction is good for their members' long-term job pipeline, which is a vote of confidence in the industry's build-out continuing even amid the broader political backlash. Third, and worth holding onto with appropriate skepticism: a standards process co-designed by the industry it will regulate is not the same thing as independent regulation, and critics are right that self-set guardrails tend to be easier for the people setting them to meet. Whether the standards that come out of this in 2027 end up being meaningful protections or a lighter-touch alternative to the moratoriums they're designed to prevent is something worth watching — not assuming either way, yet.

The bottom line for now: the conflict between the data center industry and the communities hosting it hasn't gone away. But for the first time, organized labor is positioned as a formal partner in how that conflict gets resolved, rather than a bystander to it — and that's a meaningfully different dynamic for anyone whose livelihood depends on this industry continuing to build.

EDITORIAL NOTE

This post is a summary and synthesis of publicly reported news, with light editorial commentary and analysis from UptimeJobs.io. It is not financial, investment, legal, or career advice, and it should not be relied upon as fact-checked, real-time market data or as a substitute for professional guidance. Readers making investment or career decisions should consult primary sources and qualified professionals.

The commentary, framing, and conclusions above are opinion and analysis, not statements of fact, and reflect UptimeJobs.io's interpretation of third-party reporting at the time of writing. We have not independently verified the figures, quotes, or claims attributed to outside sources, and those sources may themselves later be corrected, updated, or disputed. Polling figures cited from the American Infrastructure Alliance's own research were commissioned by the alliance itself and should be read with that in mind; figures cited from Food & Water Watch reflect that organization's own research methodology and advocacy position and may be disputed by other analysts or by the industry. Company names, unions, elected officials, advocacy groups, and other organizations mentioned are referenced for reporting and commentary purposes only; UptimeJobs.io is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or speaking on behalf of any company, union, official, or individual named here. Facts, figures, and circumstances described may change after publication, and we are under no obligation to update this post to reflect later developments. Nothing here should be read as a prediction or guarantee of future hiring trends, legislative outcomes, company performance, or industry outcomes.

Sources

Related Links:

https://uptimejobs.io/blog/industry-update-week-of-october-4th-aws-drops-data-center-ndas

Back to blog